![]() I deal with most “priority” emails right away, then do a quick browse of the rest of the emails a couple of times a day. You can personalize the settings, marking emails as important or unimportant, and I’m frequently marking emails as “unimportant.” My workflow has already changed. If anything, I’ve found that the priority section errs on the side of inclusiveness. ![]() That might sound like the obvious spin of a product manager promoting his product, but I’ve played with Priority Inbox for a couple of days and had a similar response. He compared the initial usage period to the early days of spam folder, when users till need to check the spam section to make sure nothing important slipped in - with Priority Inbox, he kept checking the undifferentiated inbox at first, but eventually focused more and more on important emails. Sheth told me that he has been testing Priority Inbox for a few months, and now he finds it hard to go back to regular inboxes. “A message that might be important to you might not be important to me, and might be even more important to someone else,” he said. ![]() Google Enterprise Senior Product Manager Rajen Sheth said that it has been challenging to develop the algorithm to find the best emails, which is based on “signals” like who sent the email, the words used, and how you’ve treated past emails. The feature divides your inbox into three areas, all viewable in one screen - at the top, there’s the “priority” emails, the ones you should read first below that are the emails you have starred (an existing Gmail feature to mark emails as important) and the inbox with everything else.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |